<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mrs Darcy, Episode Eleven</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/2010/01/mrs-darcy-episode-eleven/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/2010/01/mrs-darcy-episode-eleven/</link>
	<description>NO SOONER THE WORD THAN THE FICTION</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:57:36 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/2010/01/mrs-darcy-episode-eleven/comment-page-1/#comment-2767</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/?p=1123#comment-2767</guid>
		<description>Thanks! I find myself wondering that too :)  I think an awful lot depends on how much of an audience I can pull in as it goes on. If I could get some reasonable numbers (and don&#039;t ask me how many that is - I have no idea), it could provide leverage towards a &quot;proper&quot; publication. But for that to happen, I need to pull a few more marketing stunts. And I also need to make it easier for newcomers to catch up, so I need to improve the navigation. But it&#039;s an interesting exercise. My main worry before embarking on this was that I would make a complete fool of myself, but enough people whose opinions I respect seem to be liking it, so I&#039;m less bothered about that now.

And I take your point about &quot;late forties&quot;. It&#039;s authorial intrusion. That&#039;s the problem with self-publishing - self-editing is always second best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! I find myself wondering that too <img src='http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I think an awful lot depends on how much of an audience I can pull in as it goes on. If I could get some reasonable numbers (and don&#8217;t ask me how many that is &#8211; I have no idea), it could provide leverage towards a &#8220;proper&#8221; publication. But for that to happen, I need to pull a few more marketing stunts. And I also need to make it easier for newcomers to catch up, so I need to improve the navigation. But it&#8217;s an interesting exercise. My main worry before embarking on this was that I would make a complete fool of myself, but enough people whose opinions I respect seem to be liking it, so I&#8217;m less bothered about that now.</p>
<p>And I take your point about &#8220;late forties&#8221;. It&#8217;s authorial intrusion. That&#8217;s the problem with self-publishing &#8211; self-editing is always second best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AliB</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/2010/01/mrs-darcy-episode-eleven/comment-page-1/#comment-2766</link>
		<dc:creator>AliB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/?p=1123#comment-2766</guid>
		<description>Yup - great punch-line - happened along like it was always meant to be.
While I catch up I find myself wondering about how this is going to go, not storywise (looking forward to many surprises) but as a publication. Somehow find it hard to imagine it as anything other than a blog. It&#039;s ideally pitched for the medium. 
Meanwhile an editor&#039;s nitpick in Ep10 - &#039;in her late forties&#039; just strikles me as out of place, or are we sending something up - again?
AliB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup &#8211; great punch-line &#8211; happened along like it was always meant to be.<br />
While I catch up I find myself wondering about how this is going to go, not storywise (looking forward to many surprises) but as a publication. Somehow find it hard to imagine it as anything other than a blog. It&#8217;s ideally pitched for the medium.<br />
Meanwhile an editor&#8217;s nitpick in Ep10 &#8211; &#8216;in her late forties&#8217; just strikles me as out of place, or are we sending something up &#8211; again?<br />
AliB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
