<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Problem with Poetry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/2009/11/the-problem-with-poetry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/2009/11/the-problem-with-poetry/</link>
	<description>NO SOONER THE WORD THAN THE FICTION</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:57:20 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/2009/11/the-problem-with-poetry/comment-page-1/#comment-1894</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/?p=953#comment-1894</guid>
		<description>Absolutely. It&#039;s also true that the intersection of literary and funny is non-empty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely. It&#8217;s also true that the intersection of literary and funny is non-empty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stu</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/2009/11/the-problem-with-poetry/comment-page-1/#comment-1889</link>
		<dc:creator>stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/?p=953#comment-1889</guid>
		<description>I did. I think that some places, once they make the mistake of asking for &quot;literary&quot; stuff, are never going to see another funny piece again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did. I think that some places, once they make the mistake of asking for &#8220;literary&#8221; stuff, are never going to see another funny piece again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/2009/11/the-problem-with-poetry/comment-page-1/#comment-1869</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/?p=953#comment-1869</guid>
		<description>Good point about formal poetry, stu. And it can so easily tip into doggerel if you&#039;re not careful. But don&#039;t knock silly poetry - I often get the impression that poetry editors tend to get loads of miserable ultra-serious stuff and will welcome anything with a dash of humour in it. The same applies to prose as well, of course - in fact, didn&#039;t you say as much when you accepted my piece for Gloom Cupboard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about formal poetry, stu. And it can so easily tip into doggerel if you&#8217;re not careful. But don&#8217;t knock silly poetry &#8211; I often get the impression that poetry editors tend to get loads of miserable ultra-serious stuff and will welcome anything with a dash of humour in it. The same applies to prose as well, of course &#8211; in fact, didn&#8217;t you say as much when you accepted my piece for Gloom Cupboard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stu</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/2009/11/the-problem-with-poetry/comment-page-1/#comment-1868</link>
		<dc:creator>stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/?p=953#comment-1868</guid>
		<description>Free poetry is hard to do well, but so is the more formal sort, if only because, while it is easy to produce a mediocre poem following the form, it is much harder to follow it while at the same time conveying emotion and/or meaning.

I mostly seem to have given up on poetry these days, except for the silly sort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free poetry is hard to do well, but so is the more formal sort, if only because, while it is easy to produce a mediocre poem following the form, it is much harder to follow it while at the same time conveying emotion and/or meaning.</p>
<p>I mostly seem to have given up on poetry these days, except for the silly sort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/2009/11/the-problem-with-poetry/comment-page-1/#comment-1851</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/?p=953#comment-1851</guid>
		<description>As you say Barry, it&#039;s definitely an excellent mind exercise, even if it is quite scary at first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you say Barry, it&#8217;s definitely an excellent mind exercise, even if it is quite scary at first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Napier</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/2009/11/the-problem-with-poetry/comment-page-1/#comment-1848</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Napier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanpinnock.com/?p=953#comment-1848</guid>
		<description>See, I think free verse poetry is the best mind-exercise there is.  I avoided it for a very long time and really only gave it  try when I got more comfortable with flash fiction.

Congrats on the interview...can&#039;t wait to check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, I think free verse poetry is the best mind-exercise there is.  I avoided it for a very long time and really only gave it  try when I got more comfortable with flash fiction.</p>
<p>Congrats on the interview&#8230;can&#8217;t wait to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
